Cuba was
placed on list in 1982 but has ‘provided assurances it will not support acts of
international terrorism in the future’ yet economic sanctions remain
The United
States has formally dropped Cuba from its list of state sponsors of terrorism,
the US State Department has announced, adding a symbolic punctuation mark to
the talks that aim to end decades of antagonism.
The removal
of Cuba from the US terrorism list eliminates an obstacle to restoring
diplomatic ties between the countries after a 50-year estrangement. Cuban
diplomats had urged rescission as a condition of normalizing relations,
alongside the restoration of bank services for Cubans in the US.
But the
removal will have a limited impact on US economic sanctions, which remain in
place under the embargo that has been imposed by Congress for decades.
Rescinding
the designation against Cuba is “an important step”, an American official told
Reuters, before qualifying that “as a practical matter, most restrictions
related to exports and foreign aid will remain due to the comprehensive trade
and arms embargo”.
While some
businesses and travelers have taken advantage of the relaxed rules surrounding
Cuba, major banks and financial institutions remain wary of the legal minefield
put in place by the embargo.
“The
embargo is still the big 800lb gorilla in the room,” said David Schwartz, chief
executive of the Florida International Bankers Association. “Lifting the terror
designation is a help to foreign banks that are dealing with Cuba and have had
that concern, and this may in their mind ease that burden.
“But
although the administration is pushing to the limit of what they can do, to go
any further would require lifting the embargo,” he said.
President
Barack Obama ordered the State Department in December to review Cuba’s presence
on the terror list and report back to him within six months, as part of his
administration’s new policy toward the island nation.
When that
review was complete, Obama wrote to Congress in April, saying that the Cuban
government “has not provided any support for international terrorism” in the
past six months, and has “provided assurances that it will not support acts of
international terrorism in the future”.
In its
statement, the State Department said: “While the United States has significant
concerns and disagreements with a wide range of Cuba’s policies and actions,
these fall outside the criteria relevant to the rescission of a State Sponsor
of Terrorism designation.”
A handful
of outspoken congressman, including Florida senator and Republican presidential
candidate Marco Rubio, immediately denounced rapprochement. Rubio said that to
take Cuba off the list would be a “terrible mistake”, but he and allies such as
representatives Pete King and Scott Garrett failed to muster congressional
resistance against the rescission.
Former
Florida governor Jeb Bush agreed with Rubio, his unofficial rival for the
Republican 2016 nomination, in calling the move a mistake. “Obama seems more
interested in capitulating to our adversaries than in confronting them,” he
said
Cuba was
placed on the list in 1982 for supporting communist rebels in Latin America and
Africa, but the US has not accused the island nation of direct military
assistance for a foreign terrorist group in years.
Recent
State Department reports have criticized Cuba for offering safe haven to
members of the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia, Farc, and the Basque
separatist group Eta. Cuba has since distanced itself from Eta, and is
currently hosting peace talks between Farc and the Colombian government.
Frank
Calzon of the Center for Free Cuba, a pro-democracy group, brought up Farc as
well as American fugitives who fled to Cuba in his criticism of the Obama
administration. “The president has given up the one leverage he had to obtain
fugitives that murdered Americans and who are enjoying the hospitality of the
Castro regime,” he said.
“Cuba’s
listing as a sponsor of terror was renewed for years under this president. I
think it’s shameful that Mr Obama acquiesced to Raúl Castro’s pressure.”
Both the
president and Congress were criticized by Joe Connor, an American whose father
was killed by a bomb set by Puerto Rican nationalists, one of whom escaped
prison to Cuba. “We are truly living in an upside-down society,” Connor said,
when “Obama capitulates to the likes of Cuba and then Congress, who is supposed
to represent the people, capitulates to Obama.”
But the
Cuban-American community has grown increasingly divided by age and politics
over relations with the island, as evinced by other groups who voiced support
for the removal.
The
Washington DC-based Cuba Study Group said it was “pleased” by the rescission
from the list. “For years, the arguments justifying Cuba’s continued inclusion
[were] becoming more political than factual,” the group said, before urging
Congress to lift the embargo.
“While
today’s announcement is important and symbolic, the US’s complex web of
codified sanctions still create significant obstacles which hinder our ability
to assist Cuba’s civil society and thus facilitate peaceful change,” their
statement reads.
Younger
Cuban Americans have also supported rapprochement with Cuba, forming
organizations such as Cuba Now, which supports greater business ties between US
and Cuban companies. Ric Herrero, executive director of the group, welcomed the
change of Cuba’s status. Conceding “there is much to criticize about the Cuban
government’s repressive practices”, he described Cuba’s place on the list as
“the result of domestic political calculations rather than factual findings”.
“By lifting
the designation, a cloud is lifted that will make it easier for US citizens and
American businesses to embrace the new regulatory environment in support of the
Cuban people.”
Roots for
Hope, a nonprofit led by young people in the Miami area, similarly advocates
for greater interaction with Cubans, and has allied with tech companies to
build internet infrastructure on the island.
The only
countries that will now remain on the US terror list are Iran, Sudan and Syria.

No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.